•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03669 Summary:

BILL NOA03669
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00916
 
SPONSORConrad
 
COSPNSRBerger, Buttenschon, McMahon, Lunsford, Schiavoni, Burdick, Gonzalez-Rojas, McDonald, Carroll P, Ramos, Shimsky, Seawright, Sayegh
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§387 & 390, Judy L
 
Raises the minimum fee for temporary interpreters; requires that town and village courts share in the compensation of such temporary interpreters.
Go to top

A03669 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3669
 
SPONSOR: Conrad
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the judiciary law, in relation to requiring town and village courts compensate temporary interpreters for deaf or hard of hearing persons   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Town and Village Justice Courts are facing exponential cost increases with the growing demand for court interpreters. The New-York State Unified Court System has raised the per diem rate for full day - $385 and half day services - $220 as well as milage rates to meet this demand. However, since the 1990s Town and Village Courts have received only $25 per day reimbursement from their county government to help offset the ' cost.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends chapter 15 Section 387 of judiciary law of 1975 to increase the rate of reimbursement county governments from $25 per day to one hundred ten dollars ($110) per day for services by a temporary court interpreter. If the cost is more than $110 the remaining balance will be paid by the town or village where the court is located. Section 2 provides the same rate increases for interpreters for the deaf or hard of hearing.   JUSTIFICATION: As per our state constitution, each town must support a justice court. Proper representation is a hallmark of equal access to justice. It is every person's right to be treated fairly. Whenever necessary, it is the Court's responsibility to provide in=person translation services. Fail- ure to provide appropriate translation services may create an appealable issue as it may impact the defendant's right to due process. Due to the increase in cultural diversity, our town and village courts are seeing more and more demand for interpreter services for multiple languages as well as for the deaf and hard of hearing. Our county government needs to provide additional support to help defray the cost for these services.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Legislation   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: No cost for state government. County government costs TBD.   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately
Go to top